To make intelligent decisions about the future of energy, we need to think big-picture—to look carefully at the benefits and costs to human life of every course of action. Unfortunately, in today’s energy debate we are taught, with politically incorrect forms of energy such as fossil fuels, to only look at the negative picture—often highly exaggerated or taken out of context.

There are at least four common fallacies used to discourage big-picture thinking and breed opposition to fossil fuels. These are things to be on the lookout for when you follow the cultural debate; they are everywhere, and all four are used to attack what might be the most important technology of our generation: shale energy aka “fracking.”

1. The Abuse-Use Fallacy

The largest fossil fuel controversy today, besides the broader climate change issue, is fracking—shorthand for hydraulic fracturing—one of several key technologies for getting oil and gas out of dense shale rock, resources that exist in enormous quantities but had previously been inaccessible at low cost.

Fracking has gotten attention, not primarily because of the productivity revolution it has created, but because of concerns about groundwater contamination. The leading source of this view is celebrity filmmaker Josh Fox’s Gasland (so-called) documentaries on HBO. Looking at how these movies have affected public opinion is an instructive exercise. Both Gasland movies follow a similar three-part formula. First, Fox tells a sad story about a family undergoing a problem, usually with their drinking water. “When we turn on the tap, the water reeks of hydrocarbons and chemicals,” says John Fenton of Pavillion, Wyoming. Then Fox blames it on the oil and gas industry’s use of fracking—without exploring any alternative explanations, such as the fact that methane and other substances often naturally seep into groundwater. This is the false-attribution fallacy, which I’ll discuss in a minute.

Even if Fox’s examples were true, it would be illegitimate of him to conclude what he concludes today and what “fracktivists” demand—that fracking, and really all oil and gas drilling, should be illegal, as if any technology that can be misused should be outlawed.

Any technology can be abused. As we have seen, people are dying right now because of bad practices in the wind turbine production chain. It is irrational to say that because a technology or practice can be abused, it ought not be used.

I call this the abuse-use fallacy. It is a blueprint for opposing any technology. For example, Fox could make Carland, which could show car crashes and then blame all of them on “Big Auto.” Then he could argue that because car crashes are possible, we don’t need cars. In fact, Fox could make a far more alarming movie than Gasland based on supposedly risk-free solar and wind technology. Imagine a scene at a rare-earth mine in a movie called Wasteland.

Defenders of fracking often point out that the “abusers” Fox cities are false attributions—the next fallacy we’ll discuss. But the pattern of argument would be wrong even if Fox wasn’t fabricating particular abuses; individual abuses do not prove that an entire technology should not be used—they prove it should not be abused.

The abuse-use fallacy is deadly because it can be used to attack anything a group opposes. As citizens, we hate to see even one coal mine accident, one spill of hazardous liquids, or one example of industry corruption, but we must use that feeling to advocate for proper laws and best practices, not to drive us to outlaw crucial technologies.

2. The False-Attribution Fallacy

False attribution is claiming that one event causes another, devoid of proof. For example, in Gasland, Josh Fox famously showed people lighting their water on fire—a phenomenon that, unknown to many, is a frequent natural occurrence almost always stemming from the natural presence of methane (natural gas) in the water. But it gets falsely attributed to fracking, as do many groundwater problems that are actually due to natural contamination of standard water wells.

A U.S. Geological Survey study conducted between 1991 and 2004 examined the quality of water from domestic wells and found: “More than one in five (23 percent) of the sampled wells contained one or more contaminants at a concentration greater than a human-health benchmark. . . . Contaminants most often found at concentrations greater than human-health benchmarks were inorganic chemicals, with all but nitrate derived primarily from natural sources.” In other words, more than one in five wells are naturally contaminated according to our government’s standards. Yet we are taught to treat “natural” water as clean and blame all dirty water on industry, especially the fossil fuel industry.

Attributing water issues to fracking is almost always disingenuous. Here’s the truth about groundwater. Every technology uses raw materials that must be mined from the ground, and anytime we drill or mine or dig underground, groundwater can be compromised. Of all the things you can do underground, fracking is the least likely to affect groundwater, because it takes place thousands of feet away from it. As President Obama’s former EPA administrator Lisa Jackson acknowledged, there is no “proven case where the fracking process itself has affected water. . . .”

If an oil company causes contamination at a fracked oil or gas well, it almost certainly has nothing to do with the fracking element of the process, but rather something near the groundwater, such as a surface spill of oil or some other liquid. So why single out fracking? Because attacks on fossil fuels thrive on technophobia—the fear of new technology—which is exploited by using unfamiliar, unknown terms like fracking. If Fox had opposed drilling, he wouldn’t have gotten very far, because the public knows that, while accidents can happen while drilling, drilling itself is a vital human activity.

A more sophisticated version of false attribution uses prestigious studies based on speculative models. Just as climate discussions today are governed by speculative models whose (in) validity is rarely specified, so are pollution discussions. Regulators often use models that assert unprovable relationships between tiny amounts of particulate emissions and health problems.

The evidence is brought to us via “studies,” cited by news media eager to run dramatic, “if it bleeds it leads” headlines. The main thing to watch out for here is a statement like “X causes Y”—e.g., “coal causes asthma.” That’s usually an oversimplification at best; often it’s completely bogus. It’s hard to prove cause and effect. Here’s a good question to ask when you encounter these kinds of claims: “Could you explain how you prove that—how you know that coal in particular caused asthma instead of everything else that might have caused it?” Usually the answer is no.

Let’s look briefly at the claim that coal causes asthma problems through power plants’ emission of particulate matter (PM).

Asthma or chronic respiratory disease has become more prevalent in Western countries.That has triggered a variety of theories about the causes. Claims about decreasing air quality or increasing exposure to toxins do not stand up, as the increase in prevalence seems to be strongest in countries with much improved environmental quality; for example, wealthier, cleaner West Germany had more asthma problems than poorer, dirtier East Germany.

To put it in reverse, countries with higher pollution levels have systematically shown lower rates of chronic respiratory diseases like asthma. Something like asthma is a complex issue, and to use it to attack coal is to attack the health of everyone.

Or take mercury. Here’s a summary of the typical argument about coal and mercury: Coal naturally contains mercury, a neurotoxin that can damage the nervous system, the brain, and other organs. When we burn coal, that mercury gets released into the atmosphere and ultimately rains down into bodies of water. This leads to higher mercury levels in fish, which lead to higher mercury levels in our bodies when we eat fish. Those levels are dangerous, particularly to the fetuses of pregnant women, whose children can experience developmental problems and learning disabilities. Therefore, coal is a massive threat to public health.

But here’s the full context.

Mercury, a metal element, exists naturally throughout the world, most notably in the oceans, which contain an estimated 40 million to 200 million tons of mercury, as well as in most forms of plant and animal life. Mercury is released into the air by volcanoes, wildfires, and in far lesser quantities, the burning of coal. Natural causes of mercury are why the region of the United States with the highest mercury levels is the Southwest, whereas there are much lower levels in coal-heavy West Virginia and Kentucky.

Mercury, like any substance, is toxic in certain forms and doses and harmless in others. The form of mercury that is of particular concern to human health is called methylmercury (or monomethylmercury), a combination of mercury, carbon, and hydrogen. Discussions of “mercury poisoning” are misleading, because mercury becomes methylmercury only under certain conditions, and methylmercury can be absorbed by human beings in relevant quantities only under certain conditions; for example, the element selenium seems to prevent the absorption of methylmercury. (Read more about mercury here and here).

To be sure, negative cause-and-effect relationships do exist between fossil fuel emissions and human health—in certain concentrations and in certain contexts—but this doesn’t appear to be one of them. Which brings us to the no-threshold fallacy.

3. The No-Threshold Fallacy

All things are poison and nothing [is] without poison; only the dosage determines that something is not a poison.

—Paracelsus, sixteenth century

The world around us and our own bodies consist of chemicals. All of them, without a single exception, can be poisonous to us if we are exposed to them in a certain concentration (which can be too high or too low) or in a certain form.

A simple example of this is medication. In the right concentration, a given hormone, heavy metal, or complex organic molecule can be lifesaving or can treat some nasty symptoms of a disease. Antibiotics are essentially poisons to microorganisms inside our bodies. If we take too much of certain drugs, we will die immediately.

The same is true for all substances in our bodies. Inside our bone tissue, for instance, there is a radioactive potassium isotope in a low concentration. Even pure water, which is the main constituent of our bodies, is a potential threat to our health. Drinking too much distilled water is dangerous because mineral-poor water entering our metabolism causes a mineral imbalance on the cellular level. On the other hand, pouring distilled, mineral-poor water on our skin is no threat.

A poison or pollutant is always a combination of substance and dose. If someone mentions just a substance to scare you, independent of the context or the dose, he has given you meaningless, misleading information. He is assuming or expecting you to assume that if a substance is dangerous in some dosage, it is dangerous in all dosages. One variant of this argument used to attack shale energy is the claim that fracking causes earthquakes. This assertion is true in that fracking causes some amount of underground, Earth-moving activity, but in almost all cases, it is completely inconsequential and not even discernible at the surface. A typical tremor that can be caused by hydraulic fracturing is −2 on the Richter scale, a “quake” that is not felt at the surface, causes no damage, and can be measured only deep underground. Such quakes are occurring continuously throughout the Earth, fracking or no fracking.

What about a worst-case scenario? Many say that it’s between 3 and 4 on the Richter scale, which means you can feel the quake but it’s unlikely strong enough to cause damage. And this is an incredibly unlikely scenario. For this we are supposed to ban all fracking?

Even if fracking in a certain place had a high risk of a truly dangerous earthquake—say, because it is near some seismically vulnerable area—that is an argument against fracking in that particular place, not an argument against fracking as such.

When one treats something as poisonous regardless of dosage, he is denying the existence of a threshold at which a substance goes from being benign to harmful. If you deny a threshold, you can make a case for banning anything.

The no-threshold fallacy was used particularly insidiously in opposing nuclear power. People said we should have zero tolerance for radiation—not knowing, apparently, that the potassium in their bone tissue emits radiation, enough so that sleeping with a spouse gives you almost as much radiation as standing right outside a nuclear power plant. Both activities are nowhere near harmful.

“No-threshold” plus “false-attribution” is a dangerous combination in the hands of activists and regulators. They can keep claiming that nothing is clean enough and keep passing laws that regulate vital technologies, such as coal, out of existence. As always, whether we are talking about a natural substance or a man-made substance, our standard needs to be human life. That determines the threshold of danger.

4. The “Artificial” Fallacy

One of the big accusations against fracking is that it “uses chemicals.” This is a funny way of putting it. Everything in our world uses chemicals, because our world is made of chemical elements.

To continue reading, visit: http://www.forbes.com/sites/alexepstein/2015/10/15/four-fallacies-that-fracktivists-use-to-scare-you/4/

More Posts

Stuck at Home? Here Are Five Oil & Gas Reads to Keep You Company

Fast Facts About the “King of the Wildcatters”

One Reason Russia Might Like To See Bernie Sanders Elected

Industry group warns fracking ban could cost 7.5M jobs in US

The Absurdity of the Bernie Sanders and AOC Anti-Fracking Crusade

Arizona Legislature Approves Proposal to Block Local Governments from Banning Natural Gas

Fiona Hill Educates Democrats: Fracking Hurts Putin

5 Obvious Reasons Oil and Natural Gas is Beneficial

Someone Please Tell Us: How are Fracking and Sexually Transmitted Infections Related?

Fract Checking the February Democratic Debate

5 Reasons to LOVE Natural Gas

How Oil and Natural Gas Power American Agriculture

Fract Checking the Janurary Democratic Debate

The Top 5 Oilfield Innovations

New Pavillion Investigation Finds No Link Between Fracking and Contaminated Water

Fracking Powers Christmas

5 Reasons Roughnecks Are the Real 2019 Person of the Year

Why Do Anti-Fracking Politicians Hate New Mexico Schools?

Fracking Powers Halloween

Green Energy Puts Georgetown Utility in the Red

5 Tech Products Made From Oil and Gas

Meet the Millionaires Helping to Pay for Climate Protests

Mean Girls Reacts to Crazy Fractivists

Climate Confessions

Fracking Powers Oktoberfest

Party of Science: Greenpeace Activists Dangle from Bridge Ahead of Democratic Debate

The Top 5 Biggest Greenpeace Fails

Activists Demand to Close Coal Plant They’ve Inadvertently Kept Alive

Here is what you should do instead of watching politicians talk about the Green New Deal…

4 Benefits of S.T.E.M. in Schools

‘Green New Deal’ preview? Texas Town’s Lofty Environmentalism Leaves Residents With a Nightmare

August’s Best Memes

Celebrities Who Are Fighting Climate Change with Private Jets

Wallpaper Gallery

Free Coloring Book

5 Surprising Jobs in the Oil and Natural Gas Industry

5 Oil And Gas Books That Book Lovers Shouldn’t Miss

Tree-hugging Celebs Take Jets to Extravagant Google Camp

Fract Checking the Second Democratic Debate

“Dumb Way to Protest”: Activists Protest Oil and Gas with…Products Made from Oil and Gas?

Comic Strip Gallery

July’s Best Memes

5 Reasons That Fracking Is #Winning

Sierra Club Channels Mad Hatter in Ridiculous New Anti-LNG Report

The Permian Basin Is The World’s Hottest Oilfield

The Best Amazon Prime Day Buys Brought to You by Oil and Gas

Reactions to Fractivists As Told By Stranger Things

5 Ways Spider-Man Reacts to Fractivists

How Baseball is Powered by Oil and Natural Gas

How Texas Is Making America More Energy Secure

Fract Checking The First Democratic Debate

June’s Best Memes

Summer Energy Efficiency Tips

Fracking For Summer

How Golf and Fracking Relate

How Oil & Gas Helped You Prepare For Bonnaroo

Why Hockey Needs Fracking

Support Natural Gas Right Meow

The History of Fracking as Told by Disney Songs

‘Freedom Gas’: U.S. Touts LNG as Molecules of Liberty

Lame of Thrones

Grumpy Cat Reacts To Fractivist Hysteria

7 Types of Fractivists in Game of Thrones

Basketball & Fracking: How Do They Relate?

Fracking As Told By Game of Thrones

Make Your Car More Fuel Efficient

Things You Never Knew About Oil and Natural Gas

Texas City Leaders Face Wrath of Residents Over Green Energy Deal

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’s Green New Deal Could Cost $93 Trillion, Group Says

Why The Green New Deal Is a Terrible Plan

Sierra Club Funder Attacks Fossil Fuels from the Comfort of His Private Jet

The Latest Data on U.S. Oil and Gas Will Blow Your Mind

Fracking 101

Sunrise Movement Asks for Gas Money to Push Green New Deal

Environmentalists Make Good Movie Villains Because They Want To Make Your Real Life Worse

Anti-Pipeline Activism Isn’t Generating More Investment in Renewable Energy

2018’s Top 10 Memes

Little Caracas on the Prairie

Fractivists Explained by Dwight Schrute

American Oil Exports As Told By Seinfeld

How Fracking Turned OPEC Into The Walking Dead

New Claim: Vandalizing Infrastructure Is Okay because Climate Change

10 Reasons Why You Shouldn’t Mess With West Texas

5 Ways That Fracking Is Helping Our Environment

Anti-Pipeline Activists Play A Cynical, Costly Game

Tweetable Facts That Fractivists Hate

Football & Fracking: How Do They Relate?

Here’s Something We Really Can Blame on Fracking: America Is Now the World’s Largest Oil Producer

Fracking, 10 Years Later: The Benefits vs. False Claims

8 Fractivist Fails That’ll Make You LOL

Sierra Club Took $6 Million from Solar Industry and Refused to Disclose It

7 Times Billionaire Tom Steyer Failed Spectacularly with His Extreme Green Agenda

You Just Paid for a Study Claiming Fracking Could Make You Fat

The Top 3 Most American Things Ever

Activists Asking Out-of-Staters to Help with ‘Local’ Pipeline Protest

Chepstow Celebrates Plastic-Free Status With Plastic Banner

Groundwater Improves Near Fracking in Pennsylvania, According to Science

Your Summer 2019 Roadtrip: Visiting an Oil Field

How much do you love fracking based on your zodiac sign?

New York’s Green Energy Roulette

FRACTIVIST FAIL: Ohio Study Finds No Groundwater Contamination from Fracking

Russian Trolls’ Post-Election Task: Disrupt Florida and Other U.S. Energy Pipelines

Unhinged Patagonia Founder Thinks He’s a Killer Bee Who Can Bite President Trump or Something

Nine Reasons Why Patagonia Secretly Loves Fracking

Schwarzenegger Says Oil Industry ‘Kills People’ as He Touts Helicopter Tour of LA

Court Punishes Enviros For Using Ridiculous Legal Theory To Ban Fracking

Top 10 Most Ridiculous Stunts Pulled Out West by “Ban Fracking” Activists in 2017

What do future cities look like?

Fracking Powers Halloween

Hollywood Fractivists Should Fear, FractCheck is Here

Jury Convicts Activist Who Targeted North Dakota Pipeline

Fracking Has Cut More CO2 Emissions Than All Renewable Energy Combined

Standing Rock Tribal Head Who Led Dakota Access Pipeline Fight Voted Out

FrackFeed Introduces Hollywood’s Worst Nightmare: FractCheck

These Celebrities’ Carbon Footprints are How Big!?

Anti-fracking activists looking for Elise Jones picket wrong house

10 Things You Didn’t Know About Pipelines

Do Fossil Fuel Protesters Know How Much Those Fuels Impact Their Lives?

Why ‘Keep It In The Ground’ Is Not Necessarily Green

Al Gore Climate Change Sequel Bombs at Box Office

Activists Costing Youngstown Thousands of Dollars for Anti-Fracking ‘Bill of Rights’

Dakota Access Protesters Claim Responsibility for Pipeline Sabotage

The Benefits of Fracking as Told by Emojis

Mark Zuckerberg Visited a Rig and Anti-Frackers Freaked Out

The Fracking Industry Deserves Our Gratitude

Your 4th of July: Brought to you by Fracking

5 Things Fractivist Ken Does

Study Finds Little Evidence Fracking Pollutes Drinking Water

Youth Movement Creating a Night Out in This Texas Downtown

List of Studies Showing Fracking Is a Major Threat to Groundwater

The Top Three Reasons Why You Should Support a Fractivist Today

TAKE ACTION: Tell Google Anti-Fracking Activism is Fake News!

Open Letter to Google: Anti-Fracking Activism is Fake News

Man Suggests Blowing Up Wells, ‘Eliminating Fracking Workers’ in Boulder Daily Camera Editorial

Fracking isn’t contaminating groundwater, study finds

Earth Day: 5 Reasons Fracking is Saving Our Planet

Days after Spreading Fake News, OPI Calls for Raising Taxes on Oklahoma Energy. Again.

Why Is the Oklahoma Policy Institute Spreading Fake News about Fracking?

Dimock Judge Cites ‘Weakness’ in Fractivist Researcher’s Claims

11 Facts About #NoDAPL Protest Damage That Will Leave You Stunned

Anti-Gas Pipeline Activists Forced To Ask Facebook Followers For Gas Money

While environmentalists celebrate ‘Earth Hour,’ they should thank fracking for lowering emissions

5 Reasons You Should Go to Texas Energy Day

US Taxpayers Might Be on the Hook for Dakota Pipeline Protest Costs

No Peak Oil For America Or The World

Study: Natural Methane To Blame For Tainted Water, Not Fracking

Environmentalist Protest Destroys The Environment At Standing Rock

You Can’t Have Offshore Wind Power Without Petroleum

Trans-Pecos Pipeline protester wanted out of California since 2007 arrested

Leonardo DiCaprio flew eyebrow artist 7,500 miles to do his brows for the Oscars

Dakota Access Pipeline protesters left ‘sensitive wildlife habitat’ trashed and destroyed

The U.S. is transitioning into a natural gas exporter

#NoDAPL Protests Have Cost North Dakota Taxpayers Nearly $33 Million So Far

Clean Up Crews Are Scouring Dakota Protest Campsite For Dead Bodies And Lethal Weapons

6 Ways Fracking Powers The Big Game

Fracking, Lower Gasoline Prices Returned $1,000 To Household Budgets Last Year

7 Reasons to Support the Keystone XL and Dakota Access Pipelines

5 Times President Trump Supported American Energy

U.S. Could Become ‘Energy Independent’ by 2026, Report Finds

Friends of the Earth forced to withdraw anti-fracking leaflets

California Elementary School Fights Oil Drilling Ban

How Frackers Beat OPEC

The Enviro-Left’s 16 Wildest Responses to Trump’s Pick to Lead EPA

The Victoria’s Secret Fashion Show: Brought to you by Fracking

OPEC’s Power Slips Amid a Spurt In U.S. Oil Production

7 Ways Fracking Makes Black Friday Possible

It’s Past Time For Fracking Foes To Obey Will Of People

Wyoming Study: Fracking Likely Not Behind Well Water Problem

Blocking pipelines is the new anti-fracking ploy

OPEC lost control of oil prices thanks to U.S. shale revolution

Former Greenpeace leader defies environmentalists by defending fracking

The U.S. Unleashes the Full Power of Shale

Fracking Has ‘Little To No Impact’ On Wildlife Says Enviro Agency

8 Reasons Why Fracking and American Manufacturing Together are “Powering the People”

Not the usual campaign drill

Up for Debate: Natural Gas Delivers Climate Progress in Texas

Oil and gas fracking industry targets Millennials for support

What EPA’s Science Advisory Board Did – and Did Not – Say about Fracking and Groundwater

Fracking throws hat in presidential ring

Fracking Throws Hat In Presidential Ring

There’s an Energetic New ‘Candidate’ Entering the Presidential Race to ‘Power the People’

Unusual new ‘candidate’ steps into presidential race

There’s a new fracking presidential candidate

Gas group suggests fracking for president

FRACKING ENTERS U.S. PRESIDENTIAL RACE AS AN INDEPENDENT

Oklahoma Policy Institute Says 9,900 Energy Jobs Lost Since June 2015, Calls For 250% Tax Hike

US exports gas to the Middle East

Science exonerates fracking yet again

Two Papers Claiming High Pollution Near Fracking Sites Retracted

Let’s Not Forget the Important Things that are Brought To Us By Fracking

U.S. holds bigger oil reserves than Saudi Arabia, Russia -study

Our Air Is Getting Cleaner, And Natural Gas Deserves Some Fracking Credit

Anti-fracking Movement Reeling As ‘Scare Tactics’ Fail To Resonate

The U.S. Leads All Countries In Lowering Carbon Dioxide Emissions

On Its First Birthday, FrackFeed Looks Back at 9 ‘Firsts’

Editorial: Who’s ignoring science?

One unassuming North Texas well 35 years ago helped to introduce fracking to the world

12 Reasons Why the Barnett Shale Is Such a Big Fracking Deal

New EPA methane rules hit the oil patch for the first time

Interior secretary: ‘Keep it in the ground’ activists ‘naive’

Feds Point to Fracked Gas as Reason for Emissions Reductions

Feds: Fracking Saves Average American $750 Each Year

More American Energy Security, Brought to You by Fracking

How Fracking Set America Free

U.S. Dependence On Foreign Oil Hits 30-Year Low

Editorial: Keep On Fracking

Fracking And Natural Gas Have Cut Pennsylvania’s CO2 Emissions 30%

U.S. Carbon Emissions Have Dropped? Thank Fracking

10 Reasons Why You Shouldn’t Mess with West Texas

Ballotpedia: No proof fracking sinks home prices

Yet Another Study Finds Fracking Not Contaminating Water

Calls for Fracking Bans Ignore Sound Science

Petroleum Used as Component in Everyday Products

Another Ohio court slaps down a city’s anti-fracking ‘bill of rights’

Fracktivists Proven Wrong in Dimock Case

Obama Will Clamp Down On Fracking — To Reduce Global Warming 0.004 Degrees Celsius

Chart: EPA’s Own Data Blows Away Claims That Natural Gas Causes Global Warming

Author Of Anti-Fracking Study Had Financial Ties To Green Activists

Lawyer Admits There’s No Proof Fracking Poisoned Water At The ‘Ground Zero’ Of Drilling

6 Alternate Fracking Storylines To Oscar Nominated Movies

And the Academy Award for Hollywood Hypocrisy Goes to: Mark Ruffalo

President’s oil tax would tank the U.S.

11 FACTS ABOUT FRACKING AND ENERGY SECURITY THAT’LL BLOW YOUR MIND

EPA’s proposed ozone rule will slow North Texas commuters

ICYMI: Another Investigation Found That Fracking Doesn’t Pollute Drinking Water

How Celebrity Fracktivists Pressured the EPA to Abandon Sound Science

The State of Fracking in 2016

Enviros Accidentally Tout Study Showing 100% Green Energy Will Permanently Kill Millions Of Jobs

‘Twas the Eve Before Christmas

Fracking Funds Texas Schools Word Search

Protected: 6 Essential Things You’ll Need to Camp Out Before The Force Awakens

Fracking Powers Thanksgiving

Want To Fight Terrorists? Drill, Baby, Drill

Anti-fracking proponents snubbed by voters again

Protected: Listicle Push

Science Proves Fractivists Wrong About Water Contamination

What is Fueling Halloween?

5 Things from Back to the Future That Wouldn’t Be Possible Without Oil & Gas

Duh: Earthquakes Not Caused By Fracking

Protected: 5 Times Fracktivists Tried to Spook You Into Believeing That Fracking is Bad

Fracking Does Not Contaminate Drinking Water, Says New Yale Study

Judge To Obama: You Can’t Regulate Fracking On Federal Lands

New EPA rules threaten the Texas fracking boom

Energy And The New Luddites

5 WAYS EPA’S OZONE RULE IS A DIRECT ATTACK ON THE FRACKING BOOM

The Saudis Gambled and Texas Won

How Back to School Week Is Powered by Fracking

9 Things To Do With the Water Saved by Natural Gas

U.S. EPA Debunks Claims about Fracking and Water Contamination. Jack Sparrow Explains How Activists Reacted.

The Green Scare Problem

10 Times Republican Presidential Candidates Supported Fracking Shared by Kittens

15 Natural Gas Products that Make You Dance

Frack On, California: Study Finds No Water Contamination from Fracking

The path to beating the anti-energy, green warriors

5 California Fracktivist Reactions To The Latest Fracking Study

10 Things Fracktivists Don’t Want You to Know about the EPA Report on Fracking and Groundwater

Campaign to Stop Fracking Sacrifices Nature for Ideology

The Myths About Fracking Are Many And Damaging

California State Study Finds No Evidence Fracking Hurts Environment

Fracking Opponents Ditch Science, Embrace Hysteria

9 Reasons You Should Support Fracking

5 Emotions You’ll Go Through When Debating With A Fracktivist

FrackFeed Puts New Focus on Anti-Science ‘Ban Fracking’ Campaign

NY Officially Bans Fracking After EPA Says It’s Safe

10 Priceless Responses to EPA’s Study Finding No Widespread Water Pollution from Fracking

In a shift, fracking’s foes face a losing streak

5 Fracktivist Quotes Debunked By New EPA Study

10 Things Denton Could Have Done With $1 Million

Greens’ ridiculous ‘feminist’ assault on fracking

25 Things You Didn’t Know Were Made with Natural Gas

Hollywood Anti-Fracking Activists Proven Wrong

Dozens, Including Sierra Club Director, Arrested At White House Keystone Protest

California “Ban Fracking” Rally: No Science, All Stunts

Prominent Green Group Likens Fracking to Rape

No, Fracking Won’t Make Your Water Burn

CELEBRITY-BACKED ANTI-FRACKING GROUP CONDONING VIOLENCE AGAINST OPPONENTS

Anti-Fracking Groups Spread Misinformation in Maryland

Don’t Get “LOST” in the 9 Biggest Lies Gasland Told Us

Top 5 Most Unsupported Things Celebrities Have Ever Said about Fracking

Ruffalo Takes it too Far